← Back to interactive map

About the Published Microplastics Study Map

This interactive map is derived from the supplemental dataset accompanying the systematic review by Nyadjro et al. The map is intended as an educational and reference visualization of published microplastics study locations, not as a current global contamination map.

Nyadjro ES, et al. Gaps and Pathways Towards Standardized, FAIR Microplastic Data Harmonization: A Systematic Review. Microplastics. 2026;5(1):11. DOI: 10.3390/microplastics5010011

10,883 Publications identified during the literature search
355 Studies met inclusion criteria for detailed methodological analysis
351 Studies were successfully mapped in this visualization

Key Findings from the Review

Microplastics research studies by sample size category

Why This Matters

Published microplastics studies have generated valuable scientific knowledge; however, many studies represent individual sampling campaigns conducted at a single location and timepoint. Longitudinal monitoring datasets remain relatively limited, and substantial variation exists in sampling methods, analytical approaches, reporting units, and metadata collection.

The challenge facing the field is increasingly one of environmental monitoring and data harmonization rather than detection alone. Future monitoring efforts may benefit from standardized metadata collection, repeat measurements, broader geographic coverage, and scalable approaches capable of supporting larger numbers of observations over time.

Policy and Monitoring Perspective

For additional discussion of monitoring scalability, longitudinal surveillance, policy implications, and characteristics that may be required for future microplastic and nanoplastic monitoring systems, see:

Chu MB. From Policy Prioritization Goals to Scalable Monitoring: Characteristics Needed for Effective Microplastic and Nanoplastic Detection Systems. Zenodo. 2026.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20586503

Educational and reference use only. Study locations are approximate where exact coordinates were unavailable. Studies vary in sampling year, analytical methods, size cutoffs, matrices, and reporting units; therefore, the points should not be interpreted as a current global contamination map or as directly comparable concentration measurements.